Conflicting statements and lack of safety protocols discredit Mr. Rooter
During Curtis’s investigation into the accident and into Mr. Rooter’s safety policies, he discovered several huge discrepancies. When Eduardo gave his statement to the investigating officer at the scene of the accident, he said he’d turned to look to see if he could change lanes, and when he looked back, he noticed the light was turning yellow and didn’t have time to stop. However, when he gave his statement to Mr. Rooter, he made no mention of changing lanes or turning to look to change lanes, he just said that the light had already turned yellow and that the car in front of him stopped.
His conflicting statements were only part of what discredited him. Eduardo quit working for Mr. Rooter shortly after the accident and was unavailable to testify. Another problem for Mr. Rooter was that, while the company had a safe driving policy for employees to adhere to, the corporate representative for Mr. Rooter testified in his deposition that there were no systems in place to ensure that their employees were competent drivers or that they were trained to safely drive a commercial vehicle.
Mr. Rooter denies liability but agrees to settle lawsuit in sisters’ favor
Curtis mediated their case in February 2015. While Lois and Onie hadn’t claimed lost wages, they still had about $20,000 in unpaid medical bills and had had to sell the car. Mr. Rooter, faced with contradictory evidence and the sisters’ medical bills, agreed to settle the case at mediation. Lois and Onie agreed to a $120,000 settlement that they plan to put to good use as they settle back into their routine, take care of each other, go to church, and enjoy spending time with their children and grandchildren.